As an anthropologist, I was taught not to trust talk about cultural or personal origins. The 20th century showed us pretty clearly that cultural or even personal attempts to recover something lost have had enormous deleterious consequences. The obvious example is the Nazi movement in Germany or, depending on your political point of view, the “morning in America” in the 1980s. Such movements of thought and people tend to gloss recent history and produce instead radical reconstruction. At the same time, the back to the future kick also gives symptomatic form to real yearning for what has been lost. At the piano, ragtime music does it for me. I wish we lived in a world where lazy, sophisticated, syncopated reconstructions of military marches welcome one to the parlor of friends, so to speak.
Nostalgia for innocence. As a trader I have my own nostalgia. It goes like this:
When I began to test the waters of the market, I was very hesitant. I opened a position or two in thinkorswim in 2010, but closed them quickly. I was afraid of the power the market wielded. Money flowed in and out with a speed beyond my imagination. I read books during the summer to get ready for real entry, and the book the made the most sense was O’Neil’s How to Make Money in Stocks. The title itself was so vulgar– it seemed to me– that I apologized to the bookstore clerk about it. But I loved it. The first 100 pages or so were devoted simply to charts which showed the price/volume trajectory of some of America’s great stock stories. The book didn’t make great claims on my capacity to find the value stocks, which it seemed and seems to me computers can do better than any of us. Instead, the weird book tells its readers to buy high and sell even higher. This made sense, too; for I had always considered the whole market to be something of a Ponzi scheme. O’Neil told me that the story was as important as the fundamentals. It still makes sense to me today, three and a half years in the future.
To try my hand at– if not the method in its most precise sense- the general approach, I opened an account at a Wall Street stock-picking game. My method was pretty simple. I would look at “Investor’s Business Daily’s” website and grab the best stocks that I could find without paying the subscription costs. I had 100,000 in the play money account. I would pick 4-10 stocks and put all my money in them. If one didn’t show results and lost more than 200! dollars, I closed the position and opened another one. The weird thing is that it worked. Here are some results and positions from February, 2011:
Portfolio Value $165,349.61
|My Rank||My Return||S&P 500|
|Action||Symbol||Description||QTY||Price Paid||Last Price||Change||MKT Value||Profit Loss||%||Post|
|Sell||Acme Packet Inc APKT||Acme Packet Inc||263||$43.03||$69.99||$3.44||$18,407.37||$7,090.48||62.65%|
|Sell||Riverbed Technologies Inc RVBD||Riverbed Technologies Inc||850||$22.86||$37.11||$1.40||$31,543.50||$12,112.50||62.34%|
|Sell||Lululemon Athletica Inc LULU||Lululemon Athletica Inc||550||$50.28||$76.96||$4.95||$42,328.00||$14,674.00||53.06%|
|Sell||Netflix Inc NFLX||Netflix Inc||184||$144.60||$220.07||$8.58||$40,492.88||$13,886.48||52.19%|
|Sell||Oil Service HOLDRs Trust OIH||Oil Service HOLDRs Trust||65||$124.82||$155.49||-$1.29||$10,106.85||$1,993.55||24.57%|
|Sell||Rovi Corp ROVI||Rovi Corp||585||$51.50||$63.68||$0.73||$37,252.80||$7,125.30||23.65%|
|Sell||NetApp Inc NTAP||NetApp Inc||75||$48.69||$57.93||$0.92||$4,344.75||$693.00||18.98%|
|Sell||Aruba Networks Inc ARUN||Aruba Networks Inc||271||$22.03||$24.27||$1.13||$6,577.17||$607.04||10.17%|
|Sell||Deutsche Bank AG, London Bra… DAG||Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch||2,500||$14.79||$16.11||$0.33||$40,275.00||$3,305.00||8.94%|
|Sell||ProShares Trust TBT||ProShares Trust||672||$38.50||$40.89||$0.80||$27,478.08||$1,605.42||6.21%|
|Sell||Fortinet Inc FTNT||Fortinet Inc||65||$39.08||$40.87||$1.99||$2,656.55||$116.35||4.58%|
|Sell||Nuveen Premium Income Munici… NPM||Nuveen Premium Income Municipal Fund 2 Inc||200||$12.67||$13.21||-$0.07||$2,642.00||$108.00||4.26%|
|Sell||Barclays Bank PLC JJG||Barclays Bank PLC||550||$54.23||$56.20||$0.41||$30,910.00||$1,083.50||3.63%|
In four or five months, I had a 65+% return on equity, including commissions. In fact, I had similar returns through April 2011 in my real accounts, too. However, I wasn’t applying the “throw mud at the wall method” that I used in the game. Instead, I became distracted and discombobulated by all the voices and approaches that I was studying. Was I attempting to make more of the “game” than it deserved? Perhaps. Was I too earnest in my willingness to study and try everything? Perhaps. Did I fail to trust my initial apprehension of the stock market and how one should trade it? No doubt.
I’d like to return to the level of success I had. And what has been lost during three years? I certainly lost the innocence– not to mention money and time. Maybe I lost touch with myself. But I can’t return to this innocence; just as we can’t return to the era of ragtime music.
I can write in an optimistic manner that perhaps I’ve gone through a kind of Hegelian process. I started out with an idea, but in the process I have encountered many people and ideas that became trading stumbling (anti-thesis) blocks as I attempted to master the concepts. Following Hegel, I might say that my consciousness has become articulated. Others might say, I hope, that I’ve paid my dues.
When innocence disappears into its loss, people experience anxiety and the old good times start to seem better than ever (ragtime music moves out of the brothel and into my middle-class living room). The truth is, I don’t recall much about the “throw the mud at the wall method” except that it worked. But the innocence only covers up the trepidation and experiences that changed me a long the way.
In another post, I’ll try to tackle some of the voices and ideas that educated me as they lead me away.